It's so obvious that the Star Trek franchise is giving up, having seen the latest film (Star Trek) on DVD over the new year.Or is it? They may intend to start new sets of episodes with the new cast without Spocks mother, 'Amanda' or without other Vulcan's in the remaining Star Trek series and movies (such as TUVOK, SAAVIK, VORIK, SELAR, STONN, T'PRING, SURAK, SYBOK, SYRRAN, T'LAR, T'PAN, T'PAU and VALERIS)?
Surely they (or their ancestors) were not ALL off the vulcan homeworld at the time of the attack as depicted in the film?
Personally I cant envisage my favourite series, Voyager, without TUVOK.
I would, however, definitely miss the Saavik and Valeris characters. (Kirsty Alley version and Kim Cattrall).
The only film that made me snore, however, was Star Trek V, The Final Frontier, so without Spock's brother, Sybok the film's central character, that particular film's abolition wouldn't be too bad!
Returning to the 2009 film. What the hell was Shaun of the Dead doing with a bottle of color creme number 1 (in his hair) and then why was he left on some remote planet festering in one scene and then reborn as Montgomery Scott, a Stephen Hawking/Albert Einstein hybrid in another scene? Scraping the barrell of plausibility there methinks.
No comments:
Post a Comment